COVID-1984: Three Truths That Are Hiding In Plain Sight

Professor Ron
8 min readAug 16, 2020

Authors note: Be sure to click on links throughout the article.

Trigger Warning: To be clear, don’t read this article if you are easily offended. Or if you think that government is all about protecting the citizenry and doing what is in their best interest this article may disrupt that notion. Furthermore, if you are a COVID clout chaser, coronabro, or a leftist liberal, you probably will not like what I have to say. In fact, you may call me a conspiracy theorist. Either way, I’m all about facts over feelings. Now, let’s get to it.

The Narrative

The beginning of the coronavirus pandemic was no doubt unsettling for many people when the world witnessed China battle a novel virus that (possibly) originated from a lab. The virus had an extreme gain of function capacity in humans, and it spread very quickly from person to person. Indeed, these were all the aspects that were disseminated by the mainstream media. America and the world sat still waiting and wondering if and when the virus would come to their shores. It was only a matter of time, and the inevitable transpired, COVID-19 official became a pandemic.

What followed was something that Rod Serling himself could have never dreamed up to write out into a Twilight Zone episode. Lockdowns, rapid erosion of civil liberties, fear porn media (and politicians), closed churches, and masks, to name a few, would all become apart of this overnight dystopia that appears to have no end.

There are so many angles surrounding the coronavirus situation I will not be able to get into all them here. However, I will focus on three things I think need to be highlighted and underscored. One of my favorite movies of all time is The Matrix. Indeed, I liken this article to the scene where Neo finally meets Morpheus, and Neo is offered to take the red pill or the blue pill. When Neo reaches to take the red pill, Morpheus utters these words:

Likewise, while you read this, keep in mind I am only offering a different narrative that the mainstream media, big pharma, big tech, (some politicians), and all the COVID clout chasers don’t want you to hear, the truth. Now, let’s get to it!

#3 Testing

One of the most significant issues, when the virus arrived at the shores of America, was about testing. Politicians and the media exclaimed that testing kits were in short supply and that the Trump Administration needed to step up the testing among the citizenry. At the time, what was not known, or at least to the masses, was that the test that is widely used to diagnose COVID-19 is exceptionally flawed. What’s more, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as early as May sought to limit the number of false positives related to COVID-19 testing. Understanding this is understanding everything. If the test used to “diagnose” those who are infected are flawed, how can we really know if the rate of those who have tested positive for COVID is even real?

Furthermore, a recent study argued that approximately 40–45% of those who contract the coronavirus are asymptomatic. Contrast to the studies dire tone regarding this known truth; I say hooray! If almost 50% of the people who contract the virus are not even getting sick, then that is a victory. Even the World Health Organization (WHO) had a Freudian slip and noted that asymptomatic carriers rarely spread the virus. Of course, the medical overlords and others I presume did not appreciate that statement from the WHO, so they walked back their synopsis.

#2 Treatments/Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Zinc, and Azithromycin

Another robust conversation surrounding the coronavirus concerns treatment methods. At this point, it would be a misnomer actually to call it a “conversation.” Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates (who is not a doctor nor a scientist), absolutely is banking on a vaccine to mitigate the circumstances of COVID. Indeed, from their perspective and other elites, the unicorn vaccine, as Del Bigtree puts it, is the only thing that will suffice as a treatment of COVID. Although Dr. Fauci does push Remdesivir as the “standard of care” for the coronavirus, the results are mixed at best, and the drug perhaps is not even effective. No worries though, there is another option to treat COVID, and the results are promising, mainly when used in the early stages of infection. What is this drug? Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Yeah. Yeah. The same drug that President Trump touted at a corona taskforce briefing as a possible treatment in April. It is important to note that when President Trump mentioned HCQ as an alternative treatment for COVID, there were less than 200 people who had died in the United States from the virus.

The fact is that HCQ used with Zinc, and Azithromycin in the early stages of the virus works wonders. Indeed, this treatment is referred to as the “Zelenko Protocol,” named after a frontline doctor who has treated hundreds of COVID patients with a tremendous success rate.

Dr. Zelenko/

Dr. Zelenko is joined with other frontline doctors who have shouted at the mountain tops about the need for HCQ to be available as a standard of treatment by the medical elites. Just in case you have been under a rock. Or you are in a trance watching mainstream media, about a dozen of front line doctors, stood in front of the Supreme Court of the United States outside and gave a press conference about the effects of HCQ and the fearmongering that has been released on the public.

Frontline Doctors Press Conference/Breitbert

Needless to say, after racking up millions of views on social media, ALL of the social media companies banned the video, dubbing it “misinformation” or “harmful information.” Can you believe that? Doctors can’t even come out and give their medical opinions about their experiences with COVID patients because their insights and experiences go against the narrative of the WHO, CDC, and NIH (National Institute of Health). That messed up! No, it is flat out censorship.

What is even more sickening is the precursor to HCQ, the NIH studied Chloroquine in 2005. What that study found was that Chloroquine was effective in treating and preventing SARS -CoV (within the family of the current coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2). The frontline doctors mentioned this study in their press conference. Therefore, the question remains as to why Dr. Fauci, who has been with the NIH for the past 40 years or so not mention this study when he talks about treatment? Dr. Fauci states that HCQ is ineffective in treating COVID. However, Fauci is basing his statement on a now-debunked and retracted study that was unethically manufactured by one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world, the Lancet. This is where you have to ask yourself, why would all the social media companies censor the frontline doctors’ conference? These doctors are prestigious medical professionals from UCLA and the like. Why would the mainstream media character assassinate and tear down individuals who are trying to squelch the fear within the public? These are fundamental questions that I don’t have time to get to here. But I will say that the mainstream media is a part of the problem. The mainstream media must also take the blame of the coronavirus fiasco that we are currently witnessing. There is plenty of blame to go around. However, based on the knowledge of these doctors and their outcomes with their patients, there is treatment available that can save lives.

#1 The Mask/Face Covering is about control, not safety

Finally, and without further due, let’s discuss the mask issue. First of all, I am not anti-mask; I am anti mandated masks. There are two schools of thought regarding the efficacy of facial coverings, and the debate rages on and continues to be a sticking point. At the beginning of the pandemic, Dr. Fauci went 60 minutes and swore up and down that mask were not effective during a pandemic, particularly for those who ARE NOT SICK and that they were mostly a psychological tool to make people “feel” safe.” I kid you not; he said this. The U.S. Surgeon General also came out against people buying and wearing a mask at the time in a tweet.

Even the New England Journal of Medicine wrote an article (seemingly) discrediting the efficacy of masks, stating:

“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”

Once again, another medical establishment had to walk back (or clarify) their stance regarding the efficacy of mask-wearing after somewhat of a backlash from their original article. Funny how often this happens. Regardless of whether masks or effective or not, no one in the United States should be MANDATED to cover their face. The mask has become a symbol of submission and control. The mask is a dehumanizing mechanism that is used to demoralize humanity. I can hear all the COVID clout chasers and the coronabros now, HEY! Put your mask on, save a life. The fact is that wearing a mask is a psychological act. Why do I need to wear a mask if I am not sick? This has always been the case with many other airborne diseases. Why don’t we mandate everyone to wear a mask in past flu seasons? Again, if you want to wear a mask, then do so, but to force other people to do so is asinine.

Also, what happens when the COVID vaccine becomes widely available? Don’t you think there will be some sort of a mandate to take this concoction? If you don’t believe that will never happen, think again. Right now, Yale University is conducting a study that “tests different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available.” In other words, the study is testing out psychological triggers that can be used against people to coerce them to take the COVID vaccine. Indeed, the mask covering is just a precursor to the future. People wear the mask to feel protected because that is the message they get from the mockingbird mainstream media. What will happen when the vaccine becomes widely available, and the media uses the same strategies they did to push for facial coverings? It all sounds so conspiratorial, I know.